The Chief Ombudsman’s inspections programme is being extended to include people held securely in privately-run aged care facilities – people who cannot leave when they want to,
primarily those in locked care facilities (‘residents’). The new programme will be phased in over the next three years.
Our first step is to familiarise ourselves with privately-run aged care facilities. We will be visiting a number of facilities over the next few months. These visits are part of our ongoing information gathering and will help inform development of the assessment criteria we will use when conducting inspections. These visits are also a chance for us to introduce ourselves and our inspection function. We’re calling these visits ‘orientation visits’.
We expect these orientation visits will start in October 2019. We will let you know further detail closer to the time. We still have a lot more work to do and, at this point in time, expect that full inspections will not start for at least 18 months.
Why the Chief Ombudsman is inspecting privately-run aged care facilities
The Chief Ombudsman already examines the treatment of people held in secure, state-run health and disability facilities, including residents and patients in locked dementia facilities and
psychogeriatric wards. Extending the Chief Ombudsman’s mandate to monitor the treatment of people detained in all aged care facilities, including privately-run facilities, will provide Parliament and the public with an independent overview of how some of our most vulnerable people are treated and what, if any, improvements need to be made.
What will be involved in an inspection
We’re still working on exactly what will be involved but expect it will be similar to how we inspect other facilities.
That is, we conduct a physical inspection of the facility (sometimes unannounced); review the facility’s paper work, policies, procedures; and talk to staff, residents (where possible), and
residents’ family, whānau, or representatives.
We use the same assessment criteria across the same type of facility so it is fair to all. Some of the things we look for are:
- How residents are treated, including any allegations of ill-treatment, the use of isolation, force, or restraint
- The facility’s protection measures, such as information provided to residents on admission, complaint processes, registers, and record-keeping
- Residents’ living conditions
- Residents’ activities, such as contact with their family and others outside the facility, outdoor exercise, education and leisure activities
- Residents’ access to health care
- The facility’s staffing levels, staff conduct, and staff training.
We prepare a report after an inspection, outlining what we saw at that point in time. These reports highlight good practice, identify areas for improvement, and make recommendations
where necessary. Reports are given to those in charge of the facility and may be published.
In most cases, we do a follow up inspection to find out how the Chief Ombudsman’s recommendations have been addressed.
How inspections differ from other audits and reviews
The Chief Ombudsman is an Officer of Parliament, not part of government. His inspections programme is fully independent of government, the health and disability sector, and private
interests. To meet international obligations, the Chief Ombudsman is tasked with assessing the conditions and treatment of detained people to determine if there are any risks, poor practices, or systemic problems in the facility that could result in a human rights violation.
Current health sector audits and reviews check to see if a facility’s systems and standards comply with requirements set by New Zealand authorities. The Chief Ombudsman’s inspections have a very different purpose from current audits and reviews, and must be independent.
Who does the inspections
Inspections will be done by our experienced team, which includes inspectors with various expertise and backgrounds in areas such as health and disability and social work. We are currently recruiting more inspectors to help us with our expanded inspection programme. Inspectors are also helped by specialist advisors with medical, cultural, disability and social
expertise, and lived-in experience, or people who have advocated on behalf of residents. Our team members are authorised by the Chief Ombudsman to exercise his powers to enter
premises, talk to people, and gather the information.
Who will pay for the inspections
Individual facilities will not be charged. The Chief Ombudsman’s inspections programme is paid for by Parliament.
What assessment criteria will be used during an inspection
We have yet to develop our inspection assessment criteria as we are still in our information gathering phase.
How to be involved
We will be seeking feedback on our proposed assessment criteria. We will let you know closer to the time when this will occur. Note that while feedback will be sought, the Chief Ombudsman is not co-designing his inspections programme. The United Nations require him to establish a totally independent inspection function so it is for the Chief Ombudsman to decide how to implement this function.
How to make a complaint
The Chief Ombudsman’s inspection role is about preventing human rights violations from occurring. This role does not give him the power to investigate individual complaints relating to
privately-run aged care facilities. There are however a number of ways to report any concerns you may have about the care you, or someone you know, is receiving or to make a complaint. The Ministry of Health has a list of who to contact on its website (health.govt.nz) – search for ‘residential care complaint’.
If you have any more questions about our inspection programme, email us (firstname.lastname@example.org). While we may not be able to answer them now, we will endeavour to do so in future.